Why Leica M Lenses Might Be the Next Big Thing

Why Leica M Lenses Might Be the Next Big Thing

It may sound bold, but I do believe Leica M-mount lenses are making a quiet resurgence, not just among loyal Leica shooters, but across the broader mirrorless world. A statement like that probably needs some explanation, so hear me out.

Being a photography enthusiast for classic lenses, I have been a longtime fan of Rollei HFT lenses since I came across them years back, which has led me to collect a few of them in my kit. While I love the colors and the images they produce, the manual focusing experience has always felt fair. In practice, it is fine for casual use, but not something I would rely on during a paid shoot.

Then came a recent rediscovery: the classic Zeiss Planar 50mm f/1.4 ZF. That lens kind of reignited my passion for tactile gear—a kind reminder of how satisfying a well-designed manual focus lens can feel, since I sold most of them away over the years. The Zeiss 50mm f/1.4 ZF is far from perfect. In fact, I would even go as far as saying it is rubbish when shot wide open: it’s soft, lacks contrast, and suffers from severe spherical aberration, especially at distance. Stopping down is a must if you need the resolution. But despite its quirks, it’s compact, solidly built, and there's a certain charm in the way it renders—closely similar to the Rollei 50mm f/1.4 HFT. The tactile experience it offered brought back the joy of crafting an image for me.

That joy has led me spiraling down a familiar path: a hunt for good manual lenses. Before you ask—yes, autofocus is convenient, and tracking is brilliant. However, if I am being honest, I am not even using my Canon R5 the way it is designed to be used. Single-point AF and, most of the time, in manual focus. Not because I am resisting technology, but because the subjects I shoot do not require face detection or any advanced object tracking. In fact, using the continuous AF often just makes the process of crafting a little bit more annoying. As shifting the framing also resets focus—worse if it misses in low-light situations—it will cycle through the entire focusing range just to refocus. Not helpful when my subject is not moving at all. Unless I am moving fast and need to catch quick moments, I will choose manual focus over autofocus every single time and build the image from scratch.

Now, back to the lens hunt story. I noticed a shift in my own buying behavior. I found myself casually avoiding DSLR lenses in my search list. I don’t think it's because they are bad or no longer relevant, but simply because it no longer makes much sense to invest in something that is constantly depreciating. Even more true for something that I am only using for fun, only to sell off later. It almost seems like the industry has moved on, despite some of the best lenses available today being designed for DSLRs—e.g., the first-generation Zeiss Otus series and DSLR tilt-shift lenses. And that has somewhat affected my decision-making process.

As I scanned through my recent lens searches, there were a few common traits. I kept going back to look for lenses that are capable of producing technically great image quality, tactile to use, compact, and, most importantly, adaptable—something I could use across my Canon, Leica, and Fujifilm mirrorless bodies without committing to a single system. That naturally led me into the rabbit hole of Leica M-mount lenses and eventually to the conclusion of the title.

As I pointed out earlier, the way I approach photography has changed as my creative process shifted across the years. At the current stage, any lens will work for me, and it is no longer just about the focal length or big aperture that I need. I was looking for well-built lenses that are specifically designed to slow down the process of crafting while pushing the image quality. Maybe part of it is just another excuse to scratch the gear acquisition syndrome (GAS) itch—I’ll admit that. But there’s something deeply satisfying about being more involved in the act of photographing that feels romantic in the head.

Now this is where I think Leica M lenses quietly shine for several reasons, apart from the fact that they provide the tactile experience beyond their legacy. The mount’s flange distance makes it attractive as one of the common denominators for cross-mirrorless system adaptability. With the right adapter, you can mount any M lenses on Sony, Canon RF, Nikon Z, Leica L, Fujifilm X, and even GFX medium format systems. While that does not sound like much, pretty much any classic lens that exists on the market with a longer flange distance than mirrorless cameras can also be adapted. This brings me to my next point.

Leica 28mm f/2 Summicron ASPH adapted on Sony a7R II with Voigtlander VM-E Close Focus Adapter

Looking beyond just the mount, the size of M lenses themselves just makes sense. They’re small, solid, and purely mechanical. No motors, no focus-by-wire, no digital overlays that risk being outdated. It is just precision-machined metal and glass, designed to be used to capture images. Besides that, the prices for some used Leica M lenses have come down slightly—though not bargain-bin cheap, they have become more accessible than they have been in years. And with independent and Chinese manufacturers now actively building and rebuilding M-mount lenses with character, if anything, the ecosystem is more alive than ever. And I think the M-mount is about to have its moment—and this time, it won’t just be for Leica users, as long as you have the money to splurge.

And just as I was wrapping up this piece, I stumbled upon the newly announced Thypoch M Positive Lock Adapter, which feels like a direct confirmation of my suspicion and what I have been discussing. These adapters come in multiple versions (M‑E for Sony E, M‑L for L‑mount, M‑Z for Nikon Z, M‑RF for Canon RF, and even M‑Arri for cinema)—all offering a dual‑lock system that drastically improves mechanical stability between the M lens and the camera. It’s not about focusing enhancements or close‑focus tricks. It’s about eliminating micro‑movement, avoiding lens wobble, and ensuring a firm, cine‑level connection. This move probably signals that the Leica M gear is evolving into a true cross-platform ecosystem, with accessories purpose-built for tactile, intentional shooting. Whether this adapter becomes essential or niche, it affirms the direction that I am betting on.

Zhen Siang Yang's picture

Yang Zhen Siang is a Hospitality and Industrial photographer. Specialized in crafting immersive visual narratives in transforming spaces, architecture, and industries into compelling stories that connect, inspire, and elevate brand experiences.

Log in or register to post comments
28 Comments

It’s important to remember that Leica M lenses perform at their best only with sensors specifically designed for M cameras. Even on the Leica SL, they lose some of their optical characteristics. This doesn’t make using them with other cameras and adapters pointless — but the image quality will be… different.

This can result in:
– moiré,
– field curvature,
– reduced edge sharpness,
– color shifts and vignetting.

This behavior is specific to Leica M lenses — and to a certain extent, modern Voigtländer lenses designed with digital M sensors in mind. It does not apply to third-party M-mount lenses that were never intended to match the optical path or sensor geometry of Leica M cameras.

Yes you are right! I will let those who have the luxury and expertise of trying out all the lenses to put out their thoughts. I only had the chance to try a few of them only, not enough to comment much but edge sharpness, vignetting and field curvature are the common thing that happen among them

On the other hand, this mismatch is exactly what gives M lenses their vintage, creative feel when used off-system. That character — often unpredictable — is part of their appeal. But if you’re aiming for color accuracy and edge-to-edge sharpness, the only reliable setup, in my limited experience, is M lens on an M body.

And of course, the compactness and tactile pleasure of full manual control never go away — no matter what body you mount them on.

To me Leica M lenses only shine as they are compact and tactile. For image quality that are MTF chart perfect, there are "better" lenses out there. It really depends on what we are looking for. Personally, while I yearn for the tactility, I still find it hard to justify the price tag especially on something that I might not be using all the time.

It’s easier for me — I work with a one-camera, one-lens setup, so the choice was pretty obvious. And it definitely wasn’t about numbers or charts. I see it as a subjective choice, not a rational one. More like picking a watch than choosing a refrigerator.

Right! Totally get where you are at right now with gear. I am still at the point of experimentations. Curiosity always gets me to purchase another lens, probably this is all the GAS that is talking haha

I don’t think it’s GAS — it’s about versatility. While I was still learning and experimenting with different genres, I had a set of four lenses: three zooms and a prime for Canon. But once I found my focus and understood what I wanted to do, I switched systems and cut it down to two cameras and two lenses — one super-precise, and one reasonably versatile. But I only shoot one genre. For everything else, it’s just a smartphone and a Polaroid. But if you want to stay truly versatile, this setup is definitely not for you. 🙂

I ended up with Sony back in 2019 as flagship Canon and Nikon mirrorless didn't exist back then and as I really wanted a Voigtlander lens, Fuji was not an option, despite the more film camera like approach. I now stick with Sony out of convenience, being able to share lenses, batteries and battery charger between cameras to save on cost. I like the smaller size of the cameras too, especially the A7C series. I love taking photographs and how rewarding it can be and the opportunities to get new photographs I really like motivates me, not GAS.

"to get new photographs I really like motivates me" - that's the essence. Anything else doesn't matter too much.

Gears that motivate us to keep creating! Its funny how I sometimes emphasize gear doesn't matter but they really do! not in technical specs but the haptics, comfort, tactility is what really inspire us to keep touching it and bringing it out to shoot

Absolutely agree! I actually wrote an article for Full Frame a few months ago about this. Gear always matters — especially in this way.

I started with Sony since their first generation mirrorless back in year 2014 and I have to say the experience was not pleasant.. It wasn't until the third iteration that Sony really made some improvements that made their camera very usable.. but too bad I was back to DSLR and now back to mirrorless but Canon since I have all the lenses I need. And also GFX and Leica L mount mirrorless.. Still attracted to the usability to Sony but my feet are too deep into my current system haha.. Well at this stage I am kinda bored and honestly not many new gear launch can raise my eyebrow

Yes! I am pretty sure what I want.. the only issue is I am also doing it as a profession so I will need a few more setups that are versatile enough to cover most of the client request. Maybe once I retire I can streamline and narrow down my gears. But that will be decades from now, who knows haha

So true, I'm seeing older Leica lenses increase in value, and good copies are becoming harder to find. I just picked up a Summicron 50mm f/2 made in 1956. Just brass and glass! I got an adaptor for my Nikon Z mount cameras, and it's fabulous!

Get them before its too late! Well, I am still staring at its high price tag and could not justify keeping them in my drybox.

You put the grip on the Leica make it looks ugly. Leica designer would not make such a grip.

I'm not as convinced as you they are set to be the 'next best thing'. M mount lenses are expensive, even secondhand and lots of people complain about third party M lenses like Voigtlander being too pricey, preferring to opt for cheaper Chinese brands or other cost effective secondhand manual film lenses. I'd love to own the tiny Voigtlander 40mm f2.8 Heliar as an everyday lens but have heard the rendering on E mount isn't great so I just stick with my E mount Voigt 40mm f1.2 instead.

What I like about Leica glass is if you buy used, you can get your money back if down the road, you decide to sell.

I totally get where you are coming from, but i was mainly convinces as M mount lenses are generally build to be small. which is what mirrorless are made for. and among all the mirrorless Leica M mount is the common denominator. Of course they do come with their set of shortcomings as with all adaptation, but if we are looking for image quality, I suppose we are not looking to be compact anymore.

Nifty-fifty — two ways. Back when I was still shooting Canon.

That looks like a nifty 50 and a hefty 50! 😅

This is why Leicas are still appealing! When I was covering luxury events, I had a glimpse of thought thinking how elegant I would be if I was hanging 2 leicas instead of 2 canons, suiting the theme of the event.

Shooting with style — obviously the most important part of the workflow.

The rangefinder system does come with the advantage of being able to have smaller lenses, I'll give it that. An A7C II and small manual lens would be a perfect street photography setup imo for anyone wanting a slightly more modern camera than a Leica M.

I do have one adapted lens, even though I'd prefer not to adapt if possible. It is a TTArtisan 100mm f2.8, a copy of a Meyer Optik Görlitz that only comes in m42 mount and it plus a metal adapter, the total cost was £200. Against a brand new Meyer Optik Görlitz for £1000 or a pricey secondhand one, I'll put up with an adapter as this lens is a bargain!

Yes! but rangefinders are tricky and constantly need calibration. If one is using the live view of the rangefinder to shoot, I would say adapting it to any other mirrorless is a way smarter choice.

TTartisan is one of those company who is making interesting lenses at a decent price. After all lens characteristics somewhat overlaps with creating shitty lenses (a joke where I share with my friend).

I totally agree about the annoying need for regular calibration on M cameras and I personally don't like the offset rangefinder focusing and limited framelines, hence why I mentioned the compact A7C II as a more modern alternative.

Also, as I like 'character' over clinical 'perfection', the TTArtisan I have is a wonderful lens. Well built and with great character, even stopped down it doesn't get clinical like my Voigtlander 40mm E mount which cost much more. No noticeable focus shift and focuses at infinity so I got lucky with my copy. Chinese lenses of late have been stepping up in quality with certain lenses and reproducing a classic manual lens at a bargain price is a nice direction to go in.

you are right! they even started launching lenses with APO elements, etc.. what an exciting time to be a photographer.. apart from the sad declining pay everything else is awesome!